I pause my election-structure work to deal with a distracting matter which is of immediate danger to the lives and health of the friends and families of Box Elder County and I present to you a letter which I have sent to the Bear River Health District:
30 September 2023
Estee Hunt
Public Information Officer
Bear River Health District
Logan, Utah
Officer Hunt,
I am writing to you with respect to the BRHD website per our telephone conversation of 18 September. I would like to thank you in your Public Information role for giving recent attention to cleansing the website of the prominent Covid messaging of the past several years. It is was desperately needed. Continuing on in the same vein, there is much more similar work to do. Hence, I bring this information to your attention as a grievance which I am submitting outside of the BRHD web portal because I need the capability to add some illustrations.
I also request that you submit this letter and its’ attachments as testimony before the members of the Board of Health of the BRHD at their October public meeting this next week. Owing to the length of this letter and not knowing if a time restriction will be imposed against my First-Amendment right to be heard, I would ask that if The Board does not take time to read this testimony that slides of the attachments be viewed in-lieu and copies of the letter be provided.
I mentioned in our phone call that there is a significant fraction of the population who are ignorant of the health repercussions of the Covid mRNA serums, and about the same fraction of the population who know, based on abundant evidence, that the Covid mRNA serums are very dangerous. I think it would be inappropriate for the taxes of the people of the tri-county health district to support tolerant or supportive messaging for the Covid ‘vaccines’ owing to their now-obvious risk.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices met a couple of weeks ago. They pretended to be objective and thorough but conveniently ignored difficult subjects. They orchestrated a business-like avoidance of meaningful topics. They did not talk about the lot-to-lot variability-in-toxicity highlighted by a simple by-lot plot of VAERS adversities. They avoided discussion of the latest Society of Actuaries data related to health impacts on, for example, employed middle-aged men. They didn’t discuss CDC’s US Nursing Home data showing impossible odds against anything but Covid serum rollouts killing significant fractions of rest home populations in the days immediately following injections. Instead, the CDC was focused on spinning increased apprehension of coming outbreaks of new variants in the midst of an apparent ice-age of Covid activity, promoting vaccines for use this fall which are made of obsolete variants, and deeming them worthy of use on healthy young children with robust immune systems.
Never before have the people of our three counties been hit with a large tsunami of ‘vaccine’ related health issues. Almost everyone knows of people, first hand, who have suffered, who are suffering with adversities or who have died. Much of this can be credited to an illegal and unconstitutional wave of censorship perpetrated against doctors who wanted to share research data, who had protocols for the prevention-of or therapy-for Covid infections. This censorship has finally been acknowledged and condemned by the US 5th circuit appellate court earlier this month.
If you haven’t read much about treatments or prevention for Covid while you have been inundated with vaccine-friendly, banner-like advertising on websites, in government controlled facilities and on freeway marquis, you might be the object of improperly spent tax dollars. People were blocked from getting the word out about government-sponsored, vaccines on social media platforms while the governments spent amped-up amounts on ads. As an example, because the government did not like a particular proposed response to Covid signed by forty-six infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, the director of the NIH emailed Tony Fauci to organize a “devastating takedown” of their work, the Great Barrington Declaration. This government campaign was fulfilled by using thug-like coercion tactics with social media companies.
The BRHD website has been updated recently including removal of some pro-Covid-related-serum-injection material. The material had had the effect of encouraging site visitors to get injected. The site can still benefit from additional modifications to ensure that taxpayer monies are not used to foster the administration of Covid serums, and to correct three-or-four years of one-sided messaging.
When the BRHD website refers to external webpages which may each, themselves potentially foster Covid serum use (CDC, Johns Hopkins, Utah State, etc.) and for whose practices and teachings, it will be logical to assume, are endorsed by BRHD, there needs to be an intermediate pass-thru page that attempts to distance BRHD, serve to warn the public to dangers, and limit potential liability with regards to people who might be inclined to follow third-party advice and be injured.
BRHD’s webpages messaged information for several years in the absence of opposing intellectual arguments. This was wrongly influenced by the US government and amounts to several years of indoctrination. As a result, BRHD should feel morally obligated to make corrective information available in like abundance now and, for a commensurate period of time in the future.
Without attempting to be comprehensive I present the following for your consideration.
The transition webpage(s) should:
1) State: "You are leaving the BRHD website. We have provided a link to the following webpage for your convenience but its content does not represent the position of the BRHD and may contradict current instructions and practices of BRHD. BRHD does not endorse use of the Covid vaccinations."
2) caution against the casual use of anything produced under an ‘Emergency Use Authorization’ (message that EUA products are risky by nature)
It is recommended that BRHD include an indoctrination-correction webpage(s) logically available in its website for at least four years. These 're-education' website sections should attempt to correct errant teachings and should link to banned-and-blocked thought leaders who are prominent in the adverse-event statistics, prevention & treatment Covid and in teaching about constitutional rights. The situation of the last few years is similar to a school system that did not include reading and mathematics in its’ curriculum and for which the students will need to repeat curriculum in order to graduate. I will mention a brief sample of suggested topics to include in the remedial study list which should be augmented many fold.
The educational correction/re-education webpage(s) should rightly cover many banned & blocked subjects. They are too numerous to list here but at a minimum should include the following topics:
1) apprise those people with Covid serum injections to compare their own health during 2020-2023 to a list of Covid serum adversities,
2) warn that a large portion, approximately 70%, of ‘long-Covid’ is thought to be Covid serum injuries, or ‘long-vax',
3) inform the user about the VAERS reporting website for looking at injuries and for reporting injuries following serum injection,
4) present important foundational graphs including the graph of variable, lot-to-lot toxicity from the VAERS database for Covid serums,
5) state that the DOD contracted for serums without conventional quality controls, noting that Pfizer’s defense in the Brooke Jackson case was simply that Pfizer delivered exactly what the DOD ordered (they were never paid for conventional pre-approval product testing, nor did DOD order or purchase it.)
6) state that the Pfizer serums knowingly contain a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 which promotes cancer viruses (the research of Professor Murakami of Tokyo University)
7) Inform that Doctors Bhakdi & Burkhardt advise that sub-cutaneous injections of ‘vaccines’ subverts the essential function of the secretory immune system in fighting viruses which by nature enter thru mucus membranes. Injections of agents into the bloodstream bypasses this first line of immune defense (secretory) which is contrary-to-nature; a more logical approach is to mimic reality and exploit nasal or oral vaccines. Subcutaneous vaccinations lead to “breakthrough infections” among vaccinated individuals showing that measurement of antibodies in the blood can never yield insight to the true status of immunity against infection
8) disclose that Covid serum manufacturers are shielded from liability
9) inform that persons can seek to use Covid prevention or treatment options (hydroxychloroquinine and Ivermectin) which have been actively maligned by the government/pharma ‘vaccine’ complex
10) inform that the FDA has no authority to tell doctors how to practice prevention or treatment of Covid. Per TXSD No. 3:22-cv-184: "They may not endorse, denounce or advise.”
11) disclose that vaccine handlers are immune from suit even if criminally negligent or willfully blind through the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act for medical countermeasures
12) inform that the Covid serum does not fit the traditional definition of a vaccine as its’ makers recommend frequent additional boosters which themselves are targeted to obsolete variants
13) inform that the CDC’s new V-safe app (phone app for reporting adverse events of Covid) has been turned off and will no longer collect safety data reports despite ongoing Covid-19 injections. Rationale for closing V-safe is not known but the existing V-safe data lists 6.5 million adverse events and 2 million people unable to conduct normal activities.
14) apprise that failure to collect public health information thru the V-safe app serves no clinical justification or scientific precedence, especially with an actively marketed product.
15) apprise that an NIH study suggests that N95 masks may contain and expose wearers to dangerous levels of toxic compounds linked to seizures and cancer
16) advise that a significant rise in carbon dioxide occurs while wearing masks, a fact that is scientifically proven in many studies
17) advise that masks impose a chronic exposure to 1 to 3% CO2 (fresh air is .04%). Animal data shows deleterious effects at less than 1% (neuron destruction, impaired memory, increased anxiety, destruction of cells in the testes, stillbirth and and birth defects).
18) advise that there is circumstantial evidence that popular mask use may be related to current observations of a rise in stillbirths and reduced verbal, motor and overall cognitive performance of two full standard deviations in children born during the pandemic mask-control period.
19) disclose that the CDC and FDA are effectively taxpayer funded marketing organizations for the vaccine industry and can make marketing claims that would be illegal for Pharma to deploy (would expose pharma to legal liability if they did the same)
20) advise that the CDC widely advertises that children are protected post-inoculation but that in this widely distributed public statement they show bias in that they fail to mention that children are already protected by their own immure systems before ‘innoculation'
21) disclose that high-ranking government employees and their family members in the US have major conflicts of interest in Covid ‘vaccine’ business and hence these people have motive to promote their use
22) apprise that Canada is increasing censorship to include disciplinary action of physicians who speak or treat contrary to its' authoritarian dogma.
23) disclose Hullscher, et al studied autopsies of 325 people who died after Covid-serum injection and attributed death to the injection in 74% of the cases.
24). advise that Doctors Bhakdi & Burkhardt identified the presence of killer T-lymposites in 90% of the organs of deceased, post-Covid-serum-injected fatalities. Ubiquituous lymphocytic infiltration by killer T-cells was centered on blood vessels, the heart, lungs and other organs, essentially invisible to coroners, hence, not listed as having died from injections.
25) advise that there are physicians and clinics engaged in the treatment and prevention of Covid by methods that do not rely on vaccines
26) advise that because of demonstrated lot-to-lot variability the Covid ‘vaccines’ are effectively random, high-capacity revolvers in an actual mass casualty game of roulette; they are essentially biological assault-weapons directed at the masses in a genocidal shooting gallery
Many brilliant physicians are writing on these subjects with surgical precision. Here are two examples by a single vaccine dissident.
On Heart Health by Robert Malone
The ubiquitous presence of Covid in cartoons illustrates that the general public is fully aware of things that government/pharma complex isn't supposed to acknowledge or discuss; this messaging avenue has managed to circumvent some of the censorship prevalent in social media.
Thank you all for serving the Bear River Health District.
Sincerely,
Fred Hayes
*Help with one of the following illustrations: You may not immediately recognize or remember Jim Jones of Guyana.
Special thanks to Robert Malone for his ‘Friday Funnies’ which supplied this post.