My third great-grandmother, Ingrid Nilsdatter, a mother to seven children, was born in Sweden, and lived as a sheepherder’s wife in the Territory of Deseret. Ingrid lived over the mountains west of Utah Lake at a lonely place named Vernon, the heart of Rush Valley. One day in September 1886 she pricked her finger on a chicken bone, developed an infection and was taken to the hospital in Salt Lake City for help. Unfortunately, she succumbed to the injury. She was only forty-eight years old at the time of her passing. Now, attesting to the remoteness of the place, one hundred and forty years following her rushed exit from Rush Valley there are less than 250 residents in Vernon and less than 500 residents in the neighboring town of Rush Valley which town is the subject of this story.
As a new candidate for Senate I opened up the voter file, casually paging through the first few screens of data when I unexpectedly encountered nonsensical house numbers and multiple people having the same name. Looking more closely I found they appeared in groups of eleven or twenty-two all bearing the name of a one specific voter, but having different registration numbers, different PO Boxes, different ages, different addresses, different state highways and even different zip codes! Each voter would have one reasonable listing and the remaining people with identical names had home address numbers that were goofy looking, many were negative numbers and most of them had a lot of fractional digits, for example instead of a ordinary street number like 345 they would be numbers like -3072.46869565218
My senate campaign was focused on election-system integrity because I know from six years of researching election systems that the election-system has cancer and it has metastasized throughout the entire country.
The Constitution stands on the foundation of the election-systems, which should be as solid as rock; the rock of integrity. The Legislative powers stand on the Constitution, but the election systems are actually resting on a sandy foundation. I see the Utah legislature feverishly working on routine legislation with an eye on detracting attention from election-system fraud; it is much to do about rearranging chairs on the deck of the Titanic.
I am a professional engineer with three decades of hands-on experience solving complex technical problems in munitions incineration, sulfur recovery, sulfuric acid production, heat exchange, construction, and equipment reliability.
My engineering education and career have trained me to carefully analyze complex systems and computer-controlled processes. I regularly reviewed technical data and procedures to identify patterns, inconsistencies, and potential issues. I commonly used spreadsheets and programming languages. I now use all these tools and my skill set that I used professionally years ago to support my election system research.
I am not a computer scientist, software engineer, or expert in voting machines or election administration software. I do not hold any specialized certifications in voting systems, their internal programming, or their testing. However, as a trained and experienced engineer, I am well qualified to examine data for basic consistency, procedural integrity, and whether the information shows normal, expected behavior.
As I contemplated what appeared to be a crime scene in the State records, I started to notice that these unusual records were all associated with one place: Rush Valley. Can you imagine a place, which according to these Utah State election records is apparently the intersection of State Highways 199, 200, 210, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, and 209?… but only Highways 36, Hwy 73 and Hwy 199 exist or run close to Rush Valley?
According to State election records it is Rush Valley where you’ll commonly find twenty-two persons of the identical name, all with distinct voter registrations and pairs of them each sharing one of ten different PO Boxes and most with disparate ages? All of these odd records occur in the town of Rush Valley twenty miles north of my great-great-great grandma’s town, Vernon.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,— Notice the “consent of the governed” part.
We each have within us the inalienable right to accurate elections and it is my inalienable passion to see that that part stays more foundational than the government that might spring from it. That is my purpose in civic society. My political objective is to watch over and stand up for accurate elections which relates to the ability to measure the thoughts and prayers that are in the hearts of the people. That is the purpose of my four year campaign of writing suffrage related articles on Substack.
Fake voters can best be called clones or phantoms. In all, there are at least 373 phantoms in Rush Valley, one for each fabricated record in the State Voter Rolls.
The Rush Valley voter registration data was given to the Tooele County GOP for use as a registered political party. Since the flow of voter registration data goes from government to the political parties there would be no official means, opportunity nor purpose for the Tooele GOP to be connected to alteration of vote registration data.
The characteristics of this modification of voter rolls is pretty much identical to the Bexar County, TX voter roll manipulation. It is done by a computer program and alters data similarly to changes seen in New York, as well. The initial supposition is that the alterations are done in state data shared with voting machine manufacturers.
The Utah legislature needs to call an emergency session to order a quarantine of the whole vote registration system and conduct a forensic examination. We need a complete re-registration of everyone like was done in 1895 in preparation for the constitutional convention. Meanwhile, Utah is rolling out KNOWiNK’s TotalVote at the present time (2026) and it is potentially the vehicle that is responsible for rewriting the voter rolls in both Texas and Utah. KnowInk’s headquarters are in Creve Coeur, Missouri yet if they are responsible for modification of voter rolls used in other states that would be interstate fraud.
The creator of the Rush Valley anomaly left fingerprints in the file that serve to chronicle detailed personal attention to the changes. This person or these people who conspired to fabricate ‘ghost’ registrations invented fake PO Box mailing addresses, added eight fictitious highways to physical addresses, and worst of all, carefully curated state registration numbers for reuse with the new ghosts from the midst of the registration system demonstrating the use of inside knowledge about vulnerable registrations. Lots of crimes.
The special house numbers invented for use with the new registrants may serve a specific purpose that begs for examination of additional data across the state. All these changes were done easily and quickly by the use of computer algorithms as written about by Dr. Andrew Pacquette (Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4). Oddly, the exploit created many clones all having the same exact ‘last updated’ date as the original (anchor) registration proving again that it is hard to fabricate false data without unintentionally indicting oneself. Dr. Pacquette is to be thanked for assisting with the investigation in Utah. Please subscribe to his writings on Substack as you read his articles and support his new election cheating card game on Kickstarter.
Utah voter registration numbers that were not in the expected range of numbers in the Rush Valley data, instead of being seven digits long (9874563) they were sixty-four (64) digits long similar to this: 100237E73F91AFCE625714FA48F928B926674CD33BDBAEC6092C55EBF0F5B72C. These were all associated with Utah’s ‘Withheld’ registration category which is a enclave for people like judges, peace officers, public figures who are free to attend to their personal business and have all the benefits of criminal law to protect against criminal violence. Another group of people, the deployed military, have all the protections of law like the first group but they aren’t personally free to protect their families and property.
Hidden voters and suffrage are inherently incompatible. All citizens have equal protection under the existing laws but advocates of cheating need secrecy to foster their work. They say the laws and their penalties aren’t enough.
All voters should be treated identically and in the open when it comes to voting. All names should be visible in voter rolls. Perhaps a mask of address could be employed in exchange for the precinct name being visible. Deployed military do not have the luxury to attend to their own security at home and deserve extra consideration.
Active/heritage Utah registration numbers commonly run from about 500,000 on up to almost 8,000,000. Another block of registration numbers occurs at around 102,000,000. Strategists can use the 94 million vacant spaces in between those two numbers to dynamically park, activate and vote illicit registrations. These ‘phantom’ registrations are made to disappear from the vacant space as soon as possible after they are used. Occasionally a computer program hits a snag and doesn’t close out an operation properly, that is when we might see data left in the voter rolls like we see in Rush Valley.
The State of Texas has vote registration database with most of the characteristics of the Utah database. Learn about the similarities of the Texas and Utah crimes from Dr. Andrew Paquette’s article here: Into the Void(s)
Texas and Utah both use KnowInk's PollPads (the device that introduced over 4,110 illicit ballots in Bexar County in February 2026). Utah is at the present time loading its Vista voter database into a new system, TotalVote, which is a product of KnowInk. Not to worry, our vote registration check-ins are processed in KnowInk’s private cloud infrastructure (I’m not being serious).
Intentionally changing or tampering with voter registration data constitutes election fraud or interference under Utah Code § 20A-1-603. Cases involving willful destruction, fraudulent alteration affecting an election, or aiding such acts escalate to a third-degree felonies with five year prison terms. Some third-degree felonies carry enhanced minimum sentences. Additional civil and administrative penalties also apply.
Federal penalties for tampering with voter registration data in federal elections (such as knowingly altering, falsifying, submitting fraudulent applications, or depriving voters of a fair election process) can go to $250,000 and five years. Additional charges apply for conspiracy, false statements, and civil rights violations.
May I take this opportunity to thank the Lord for the miracle of receiving this data for which many of us have prayed. I wasn’t expecting to receive this tranche of data when I yielded to the impression that I needed to run for office. Please repeatedly remember this act of grace in thankfulness as we go forward and ask for more similar miracles!